The FASB has issued an Exposure Draft related to Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method, which would allow for reporting entities to account for investments made primarily for the purpose of receiving income tax credit and other income tax benefits consistently. While ASU 2014-01 provided guidance to apply the proportional amortization method to account for investments made primarily for the purpose of receiving income tax credits and other income tax benefits, this ASU only addressed low income housing tax credit structures.
Stakeholders noted that other economically similar investments should be able to make the same election to apply the proportional amortization method. Under the proportional amortization method, the cost of the investment being amortized in proportion to the income tax credits and other income tax benefits received with the investment gains and losses and tax credits is presented in the income statements as a component of income tax expense or benefit. This better represents the returns from such investments than the equity or cost method.
To qualify for the proportional amortization method, all of the following conditions must be met:The effective date would be determined once the Exposure Draft is approved and application of the election would be done on the modified prospective or retrospective basis. For the modified prospective application, the reporting entity would analyze its investments that receive income tax credit or other income tax benefits at the date of adoption based on the date the investment was entered into and record a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings. For the retrospective application, the adoption would be applied as an adjustment to retained earnings at the earliest period presented.
Comments related to the questions outlined in this Exposure Draft are due to the FASB by October 6, 2022. The full text of the Exposure Draft is available here.
Readers should not act upon information presented without individual professional consultation.